瀰漫性大 B 細胞淋巴瘤
概覽
Buzzwords → Dx
| Buzzword / Concept | What It Tells You |
|---|---|
| IPI / R-IPI / NCCN-IPI factors | age >60, stage III–IV, ↑LDH, ECOG ≥2, >1 extranodal site (NCCN-IPI quantifies age/LDH + specific extranodal sites) |
| Hans algorithm | IHC: CD10 → BCL6 → IRF4/MUM1; GCB = better prognosis; non-GCB ≈ ABC |
| Double-hit (HGBL, MYC + BCL2/BCL6 by FISH) | 4–8 %, usually GCB, poor with R-CHOP → DA-EPOCH-R |
| Double-expressor (DEL, MYC ≥40 % + BCL2 ≥50 % by IHC) | ~20–30 %, usually ABC, intermediate-poor; NOT reclassified as HGBL, treat as standard DLBCL |
| Primary mediastinal B-cell (PMBL) | young women, anterior mediastinal mass, CD30+, PD-L1/2 amplified → DA-EPOCH-R; pembro at relapse |
| Primary CNS DLBCL | immunocompetent adults, ring-enhancing lesions, avoid steroids before biopsy; HD-MTX ≥3.5 g/m² backbone, ASCT or WBRT consolidation |
| EBV+ DLBCL, NOS | EBER-ISH+; any age; aggressive, extranodal predilection |
| MYC + BCL6 only (no BCL2) by FISH | NOT high-risk — manage as standard DLBCL |
分類與診斷
Diagnostic Criteria
- Excisional biopsy is preferred (FNA insufficient) — needed for architecture + IHC + FISH.
- WHO 5e / ICC 2022: "DLBCL, NOS" excludes specific entities (PMBL, primary CNS, leg-type, EBV+, T-cell/histiocyte-rich, etc.).
- Cell-of-origin classification (Hans IHC vs GEP) influences research stratification but does not change first-line treatment outside trials.
- HGBL with MYC + BCL2 ± BCL6 rearrangements (formerly "double-/triple-hit") is its own WHO 5e entity and changes treatment.
- Staging: Lugano (Ann Arbor + bulk + B-symptoms). PET-CT for staging and end-of-treatment response (Deauville score).
Workup
- PET-CT (staging + Deauville at end of treatment).
- Excisional or core biopsy with H&E, IHC (CD20, CD10, BCL6, IRF4/MUM1, MYC, BCL2, Ki-67, CD30, EBER-ISH).
- FISH for MYC, BCL2, BCL6 mandatory (rule out HGBL).
- Bone marrow biopsy if PET equivocal or cytopenias (PET-positive marrow can substitute).
- CSF analysis if CNS-IPI 4–6 or kidney/adrenal/testicular/breast involvement.
- HBV/HCV/HIV serology + echo/MUGA before anthracycline.
- β-hCG in females of reproductive age.
治療
Treatment Algorithm
flowchart TD
A[Newly diagnosed DLBCL] --> B{HGBL FISH<br>MYC + BCL2 ± BCL6?}
B -- yes --> C[DA-EPOCH-R<br>± CNS prophylaxis]
B -- no --> D{Primary mediastinal?}
D -- yes --> E[DA-EPOCH-R × 6<br>or R-CHOP ± RT]
D -- no --> F{Primary CNS?}
F -- yes --> G[HD-MTX backbone<br>± ASCT or WBRT consolidation<br>NO STEROIDS pre-biopsy]
F -- no --> H{IPI / NCCN-IPI risk}
H -- low IPI 0-1<br>or early-stage --> I[R-CHOP × 4-6<br>± involved-site RT]
H -- IPI ≥2<br>advanced --> J[Pola-R-CHP × 6<br>POLARIX category 1]
I --> K{CNS-IPI 4-6 OR<br>kidney/adrenal/testis/breast?}
J --> K
C --> K
K -- yes --> L[CNS prophylaxis<br>HD-MTX IV preferred over IT]
K -- no --> M[End-of-treatment PET<br>Deauville 1-3 = CR]
L --> M
M --> N{Relapse / refractory?}
N -- ≤12 mo or primary refractory --> O[2L = CAR-T<br>axi-cel ZUMA-7 or liso-cel TRANSFORM]
N -- >12 mo, transplant-eligible --> P[Platinum salvage R-ICE/R-DHAP → ASCT]
N -- post-CAR-T progression --> Q[Bispecifics<br>epcoritamab / glofitamab]
陷阱與考點
Pearls / Pitfalls
- Pola-R-CHP is only for advanced-stage IPI ≥2 (or smIPI >1 in stage I-II). Not studied in and not recommended for IPI 0–1. Picking Pola-R-CHP for low-risk DLBCL is the wrong answer.42
- Double-expressor ≠ Double-hit. DEL = IHC protein co-expression (MYC ≥40 % + BCL2 ≥50 %); double-hit/HGBL = FISH-confirmed rearrangements. DEL is treated as standard DLBCL with R-CHOP/Pola-R-CHP, NOT escalated to DA-EPOCH-R.5
- CNS-IPI ≠ IPI. CNS-IPI adds kidney/adrenal involvement as a sixth risk factor. HD-MTX (IV ≥3–3.5 g/m²) is preferred over IT chemo for parenchymal CNS prophylaxis — most rituximab-era relapses are parenchymal (~70–80 %), which IT poorly penetrates. Recent retrospective data even question whether prophylaxis reduces CNS relapse at all — this is an evolving area.67
- MYC + BCL6 (no BCL2) is NOT high-grade. Only MYC + BCL2 (± BCL6) by FISH defines HGBL/double-hit. Isolated MYC + BCL6 rearrangement is managed as standard DLBCL.5
- Avoid steroids before primary CNS lymphoma biopsy — they cause rapid lymphocyte lysis and can render biopsy non-diagnostic for weeks.
- CAR-T 2L beats ASCT for early relapse. ZUMA-7 (axi-cel) and TRANSFORM (liso-cel) both showed superior EFS vs salvage chemo + ASCT in primary-refractory/early-relapse DLBCL. Bridging therapy (Pola-R-bendamustine, R-ICE, GDP, GEMOX) is essential to control disease pre-leukapheresis. Hold bendamustine until AFTER leukapheresis to avoid T-cell depletion.38
- CAR-T toxicities: see CART — CRS (tocilizumab + steroids), ICANS (steroids; tocilizumab does NOT cross BBB).
延伸
Cross-references
- Staging — IPI, R-IPI, NCCN-IPI, CNS-IPI, Lugano
- Drug Regimens — R-CHOP, Pola-R-CHP, DA-EPOCH-R, R-ICE
- Cytogenetics Atlas — MYC, BCL2, BCL6
- CAR-T (axi-cel, liso-cel, tisa-cel)
- Primary CNS Lymphoma
- Tumor Lysis Syndrome (high pre-Tx LDH)
相關題目
- Q-002 — DLBCL — second-line therapy for primary-refractory disease
- Q-038 — DLBCL — CNS prophylaxis decision
- Q-039 — DLBCL — double-hit vs double-expressor
- Q-051 — Burkitt vs HGBL — distinguishing by FISH and IHC
- Q-146 — Auto-HCT — when to use vs CAR-T for DLBCL
- Q-186 — Cord compression — radiosensitive lymphoma
- Q-189 — SVC syndrome from primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBL)
- Q-206 — HBV reactivation prophylaxis
來源
Sources
Drafted from OpenEvidence query 2026-05-07; cross-checked against POLARIX 5-yr update (JCO 2025) and ZUMA-7/TRANSFORM 2L data.
Footnotes
-
NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology — B-Cell Lymphomas. Updated 2026-03-12. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/b-cell.pdf ↩
-
Tilly H, Morschhauser F, Sehn LH, et al. Five-Year Outcomes of POLARIX. JCO 2025;43(35):3698–3705. doi:10.1200/JCO-25-00925. ↩ ↩2
-
Locke FL, Miklos DB, Jacobson CA, et al. Axi-cel vs Standard-of-Care in Second-Line Large B-Cell Lymphoma (ZUMA-7). NEJM 2022;386:640–654; 4-yr update NEJM 2024. ↩ ↩2
-
Tilly H, Morschhauser F, Sehn LH, et al. Polatuzumab Vedotin in Previously Untreated DLBCL (POLARIX). NEJM 2022;386(4):351–363. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2115304. ↩
-
Riedell PA, Smith SM. Double Hit and Double Expressors in Lymphoma. Cancer 2018;124(24):4622–4632. doi:10.1002/cncr.31646. ↩ ↩2
-
McKay P, Wilson MR, Chaganti S, et al. CNS prophylaxis (Single-Route). Blood 2022;139(3):413–423. doi:10.1182/blood.2021012888. ↩
-
NCCN Central Nervous System Cancers Guidelines (PCNSL section). Updated 2026-04-24. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/cns.pdf ↩
-
Kamdar M, Solomon SR, Arnason J, et al. Liso-cel vs Standard-of-Care as Second-Line Therapy for LBCL (TRANSFORM). Lancet 2022;399(10343):2294–2308. ↩